For many California employers, the first time they hear about a discrimination, harassment, retaliation, or whistleblower issue is not through an internal complaint, it’s through a lawsuit.
By that point, the focus often shifts from what happened to how the employer responded. And in our experience, one of the first things scrutinized is whether the company conducted a prompt, objective, and well-documented workplace investigation.
At Koegle Law Group, we regularly work with business owners and HR professionals who are trying to navigate employee complaints while balancing compliance obligations, internal dynamics, and day-to-day business demands. Understanding the role investigations play and the risks of getting them wrong is a critical part of managing today’s workplace.
Why Investigations Are So Often a Problem Area
Many employers are surprised to learn that employees frequently allege they “complained internally” even when no formal complaint was documented. Sometimes this is due to unclear reporting procedures. Other times, it’s because concerns were raised informally, misunderstood, or never escalated.
From a business perspective, this creates several common pain points:
- No clear record of when or how a complaint was raised
- Inconsistent responses depending on who received the complaint
- Pressure on HR to investigate matters involving management or leadership
- Uncertainty about whether the investigation will hold up if challenged later
When an investigation is missing, rushed, or poorly documented, it can make it difficult for employers to assess risk, respond appropriately, or defend their decisions if a dispute escalates.
The Importance of Objectivity and Credibility
A workplace investigation is not just about reaching a conclusion, it’s about demonstrating that the process was fair, thorough, and impartial.
Internal HR teams often play a critical role in managing employee concerns, and in many situations, internal investigations are entirely appropriate. However, employers should be aware that investigations conducted solely in-house may later be criticized as biased, particularly when HR reports up through company leadership.
This doesn’t mean HR teams are acting improperly. Rather, it reflects a perception issue that can arise when the same organization accused of wrongdoing is responsible for investigating itself.
From a risk management standpoint, perceived bias can undermine the credibility of an otherwise well-intentioned investigation.
When Outside Investigations May Make Sense
Depending on the nature of the complaint, the individuals involved, and the organization’s resources, engaging an outside investigator can help strengthen the process.
An external investigator may help:
- Reduce concerns about bias or conflicts of interest
- Provide an independent assessment of facts and credibility
- Create a clearer record of objectivity and fairness
- Allow HR to focus on operational continuity rather than investigative pressure
Outside investigations don’t have to be all-or-nothing. In some cases, they may involve limited scope fact-gathering, targeted interviews, or review of key documents and electronic communications.
The goal is not to overcomplicate the process, it’s to ensure the investigation is defensible, consistent, and aligned with the employer’s compliance obligations.
What a Strong Investigation Process Typically Includes
While every situation is different, effective workplace investigations often share common elements:
- Prompt response once an issue is identified
- Clear documentation of the complaint and investigation steps
- Interviews with relevant parties and witnesses
- Review of supporting materials, including emails and internal messaging platforms
- Objective evaluation of facts, not assumptions or conclusions
- Honest assessment of potential exposure and next steps
One of the most challenging moments for employers is realizing, after the fact, that an investigation could have been handled more thoroughly. Addressing issues correctly at the outset can make a meaningful difference in how a situation unfolds.
Using Investigations as a Tool, Not Just a Reaction
Too often, investigations are viewed as a box to check or a reaction to an immediate problem. In reality, they can be a valuable tool for identifying systemic issues, improving policies, and strengthening workplace practices.
When handled thoughtfully, investigations can help employers:
- Understand where breakdowns in communication occurred
- Identify training or policy gaps
- Address concerns before they escalate into formal claims
- Make informed, business-minded decisions grounded in facts
This proactive approach aligns with long-term compliance and stability, not just short-term damage control.
How Koegle Law Group Supports Employers
At Koegle Law Group, we partner with California employers to approach workplace investigations with clarity, structure, and practicality. Our role often includes helping clients:
- Evaluate whether an internal or external investigation is appropriate
- Identify investigation scope and documentation considerations
- Understand how investigation outcomes may impact risk and next steps
- Align investigation practices with broader compliance strategies
Our focus is not just resolving the immediate issue, but helping employers build systems and processes that reduce repeat problems and support confident decision-making.
Workplace issues are rarely just legal, they are operational, cultural, and human. Addressing them early and thoughtfully can help protect both your business and your team.
If your organization is reviewing its investigation practices or looking to strengthen its approach to employee complaints, we welcome the opportunity to talk through your options and provide practical guidance tailored to your business.
👉 Contact Koegle Law Group to schedule a consultation and get clarity on how we can help guide your business the right way.
[Contact Us] | [Schedule a Strategy Call] | [Subscribe to Our Newsletter]
This communication may be considered advertising material under the rules of professional conduct governing lawyers in California.